Write your service experience

News from a new memoir collection project: Seeds of Service.

Here’s their introduction:

Have you committed a year or more to post-graduate service in the United States?

Do you have reflections to share about your experience in one of America’s faith-based service programs?

Are you interested in being part of a published work?

We are looking for you!

 

We are seeking individuals who have completed a year or more of service in a faith-based service programs in one of the 50 states or U.S. territories during the years 1995 – 2011. We are interested in hearing from former volunteers who served in either urban or rural areas and in a faith-based programs of any religious tradition, be that Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, and others!

Continuing the Story….

As we reflect back on the past four years, we are incredibly grateful for the people who have supported this work–those who believed in our idea before it had a publisher, those who had enough faith in it to offer us a contract, those who have read our book and our blog, those who have engaged with these ideas through speaking engagements and reading circles throughout the country. It has been so encouraging to learn that there is, in fact, a need for the voices of young women in our Catholic tradition. Although we will continue to speak about From the Pews in the Back, we have discerned that the time has come to push pause on this blog. We encourage folks to take advantage of the resources offered on the website, and definitely be in touch if we can be of support to you in any way as you gather reading circles and continue the story in your own way.

Peace be with you,

Kate and Jen

I’m (Sort of) Catholic–And I Vote

by Kate Henley Averett

While the way in which I identify with is complicated (does “non-institutionally affiliated, non-Mass attending, preacher-of-the-Gospel-at-all-times with a thoroughly Catholic theological imagination” even make sense to me, let alone to anyone else?) and tends to vary from day to day, the question of Catholics and voting resonates with me a great deal. As infuriated as I get when the Church tells us who to vote for, and which issues matter at the expense of which other issues, at the end of the day, I would be lying if I said that being Catholic doesn’t impact how I vote. Because it was through Catholicism that I found social justice. And it was through learning more about Catholic social justice that I found liberation theology, and came across the idea of the preferential option for the poor and the oppressed. And it was taking myself to task, really thinking about what implications a commitment to the preferential option for the poor has for the ways that I act in the world, that has most informed the political opinions I hold today.

While my Catholicism influences how I vote, I have certainly never thought of myself as a typical Catholic voter. I was intrigued, then, to get an email this week from Catholics for Choice with some interesting statistics about Catholics and voting. Not only are Catholic voters not more conservative than the general public, the email stated, but the views and voting trends of U.S. Catholics largely mirror that of the general electorate. While less than half (43%) of U.S. Catholics rank abortion as a “very important” issue to them in this election cycle, almost all (92% and 91%, respectively) feel that the economy and jobs are the among the most important issues. Furthermore, “only 14% of Catholics in the US agree with the Vatican’s position that abortion should be illegal,” and “only eight percent of Catholics believe that the views of the US bishops are ‘very important’ in deciding for whom to vote.”

So while I probably still fall (much) further to the left of the political spectrum than most Catholic voters, I’m actually not all that atypical – I’m informed by my faith tradition, but at the end of the day, it is my own conscience, and not the commands of Church officials, that has the most influence over how I vote.

Kate Henley Averett dreams of a day when she can regularly vote for candidates who are pro-reproductive rights, pro-universal health care, anti-death penalty, anti-militarization, and deliberately and openly feminist, anti-racist, and anti-heteronormativity, with a commitment to eradicating poverty. Until then, even though she often feels more like she’s voting against people she doesn’t want in office than for people she wants in office, Kate still votes anyway.

Potential Saints

by Nelle Carty

In Loving Memory of my mentor and friend, Patrick L. Rattigan.

When I first started as a theology teacher at a Jesuit high school in a Chicago suburb, I had an official mentor who supported me through the academic year. There were no desks available next to my mentor in the department office . The closest space was next to the oldest faculty member in the department, and maybe the school. The other teachers, tip-toed around this no-nonsense, cranky, old man, who knew more than anyone. Everyone said hello to him, but there was a level of respectful distance that colleagues kept from this veteran educator. Pat, the old-timer, not only had a desk next to mine, but shared the same free periods. Being one of the youngest teachers in my department, and a naturally extroverted person, I didn’t know I was supposed to be respectfully afraid. So, I talked to Pat as much as he permitted during our planning periods. I began picking up the mail in his faculty box to save him a trip, and in return he started leaving me occasional lesson plans and helpful tools. As the months passed, Pat became my unofficial mentor, and eventually, a good friend.

This experienced educator lived for teaching and had created fine-tuned lesson plans incorporating a style all his own. Pat loved art. He was well-known for creating beautiful PowerPoint presentations that incorporated classic paintings relating to the various theology lesson plans. Occasionally, he would share one of these PowerPoint slide shows with me to use in my classes. He rarely shared these lesson plans with other teachers, so I felt honored to be given these pedagogical treasures. His appreciation of art added a unique dimension to his passion for teaching theology. Pat taught me that art engaged students on a different level. It allowed them to understand our Christian narrative without the confusion and limitations of words. Paintings offered a personal experience that was open to the Spirit.

When All Saints’ Day came around on that first year, Pat gave me a non-art related gem. He reminded me what All Saints’ Day was about. “Nelle, remember to tell your freshmen that we all have the potential to be saints. It’s not about being perfect. In this day and age, people place the saints upon impossible-to-reach pedestals. It’s our job to close the gap and help them see that sainthood isn’t synonymous with being perfect. It’s about being our truest self—the one God created us to be.”

Pat may have said that the 14 year-old, first year students needed to hear this, but I think I needed to hear this, as well. Occasionally, these words come to mind, and I smile thinking of Pat’s truth-filled lessons. Pat retired from teaching a few years ago and died this past February 2010. Pat wasn’t perfect, but he dedicated his life to teaching young people. Through works of art and literature, he challenged students to recognize the sacredness in the world and within each of us.

On this November 1st, we remember all of the people who have lived faith-filled lives. May these holy people who are no longer physically with us, remind us of our own potential and call to be saints.

M. Nelle Carty is trying to remind herself that sainthood is not so far away as it seems.

The Fairness of God’s Embrace: Reflections on Sunday’s Readings

by Elizabeth Duclos-Orsello

In my day job as a professor of American Studies I work to help my students question and explore “facts” about the United States that are often taken for granted. The standard narrative (the supposed “fact”) that I’ve just finished exploring with one class is the notion that “America is the Land of Opportunity”. We have thought about where this idea comes from, the cultural and political structures and systems that keep it alive, and its limits. Just last week we considered the ways in which unspoken advantages of gender (male), race (white), language spoken (English), and class (middle/upper) have opened up opportunities for some while making opportunities hard to access for others. After thinking about women, people of color, non-English speaking Americans and those without family support or a bit of luck, commonly held beliefs are harder for my students to sustain uncritically. What looks like an issue of “hard work” = success at first glance gets a lot more complicated. Class materials often upset my students’ sense of the United States as a pure meritocracy where fairness reigns.

Fairness. The sense that dedication and following the rules matters. Fairness. It is something that I honor and desire and encourage. I suspect this is in part a result of growing up in a family of six siblings and complex family negotiations. Fairness. It is something that my 8-year-old seems particularly sensitive to in playground debates and when discussing the relative size of desserts. Fairness…it is something that I can’t get away from when reading and reflecting on this week’s readings – especially the Gospel. When I engage with the text via my Ignatian training and imagine myself in the story I always find myself to be one of the unnamed persons on the street who is angered by the choice Jesus makes: Zacchaeus gets to host him? Really? Really…..? It doesn’t seem “fair”. “So what,” I find myself thinking against my best wishes. “So what that he said he will (future tense!) give away his possessions (hrmph!). He’s been taking advantage of others forever!” (Insert your favorite self-righteous stomp and head shake here).

And then I return to the first reading and I am swept into a gentle reminder and into a softness of metaphor and imagery where I am called to let go of my bean-counting sensibilities and remember that I too am a sinner and that I too am one of God’s creations and that I too am loved and embraced—because I too am of God and God is in me. The lyricism of the phrases (“how could a thing remain, unless you willed it/or be preserved, had it not been called forth by you?”) calls me to see myself and then to see others in a new light. We are worthy, we are loved, we are OK. I can understand the gospel more fully in this light. I still can’t picture myself as Zacchaeus. I can’t see the story through his eyes, but I notice him in the tree and I am more aware of his desire to find a way (back?) to God. I know this path.

But I would be remiss if I did not own up to the fact that as a woman in the Catholic church I am stuck on the “fairness” issue: There are so many who are called. There are so many who are ready now. There are so many who have fought the good fight and lived the good life and are ready to take up posts as leaders in the church and these women, these people made in God’s image…are not invited in. I think that my fixation on fairness may need to stick around for a while.

Elizabeth Duclos-Orsello holds a PhD in American and New England studies from Boston University. She is currently an assistant professor of interdisciplinary studies and coordinator of American studies at Salem State College in Salem, Massachusetts, where she teaches many courses inspired by her time in the Jesuit Volunteer Corps in the 1990s.

One Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church

By Rebecca Curtin

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten, begotten of the Father before all ages. Light of Light; very God of very God; begotten, not made; of one essence with the Father, by whom all things were made; who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary, and became man. And He was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered, and was buried. And the third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures; and ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead; whose Kingdom shall have no end.

We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father; who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets. We believe in one Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins. I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.

- the Nicene Creed as usually recited by Orthodox Christian congregations

Growing up I never knew the Nicene Creed was the source of such controversy. As a child I thought such things, the things I learned by heart, that I recited together with my family, week after week, year after year, were indelible, that they had always been just as they are now.

But, of course we learn as we grow older that this is not so. Even something as old, as seemingly stable as the Nicene Creed has for me in adulthood taken on a new level of perplexity. Indeed, adulthood itself seems to be a sort of endless complication of things that used to once be so simple.

On Sundays, I usually attend an Antiochian Orthodox Church near my home with my partner, a cradle Orthodox. We love the welcoming, tight-knit community there, and the high concentration of converts makes it so that my blond hair doesn’t immediately betray my non-Orthodox status.

Sometimes during the service I almost forget I’m Catholic, even when we cross ourselves (the Orthodox tend to cross themselves a lot) and I do mine “backward.” I have grown to love the abundant incense, the prostrations, and especially the icons, that second congregation that despite its two-dimensionality somehow seems to peer out at the congregation and participate in the service as we do. If the Catholic Church for me has always been clear the clear, bright, and light infused colors of stained class, the Orthodox Church is the luminous golds, and earthy browns and reds of the icons.

I do feel out of place at Orthodox church when we recite the Nicene Creed. The Catholic and Orthodox versions of the creed are similar, but the differences are so central to the theologies of both traditions that disagreements over them have had shattering repercussions and, some argue, directly led to the Great Schism of the eleventh century, when the two churches formally separated. These differences seem small now (i.e. the difference between “essence” and “being” or the addition of “and the son” when stating from whom the Holy Spirit proceeded) were at one time considered matters essential to salvation.

When it is time to say the creed, I usually stumble along reciting the Catholic version softly to myself, which is difficult to do when everyone around you is reciting something just a little different. But then, perhaps ironically, but also soul-liftingly we all say in unison that we “believe in one Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.” Despite our creedal differences here is a reaffirmation of unity that has always seemed to me at once comforting and also mystifyingly naïve.

But, earlier this month the North American Orthodox-Catholic Theological Consultation released a statement “Steps Toward a Unified Church” which includes a commitment to a common “statement of faith,” a common creed. The Catholic Church concedes that, in the interest of Church unity, “the original Greek form of the Creed of 381, because of its authority and antiquity, should be used as the common form of our confession in both our Churches.” If unity is achieved, Catholics will recite the version of the creed now used by Orthodox churches.

Perhaps this all seems somewhat superficial. After all, the Orthodox Creed as printed above is very similar to what is recited in Catholic churches. Can we count these small agreements as real achievements when the Church has huge issues to tackle like the ordination of women, the future of Catholic higher education, and the place of the LGBT community in the Church?

But, words are so very important. The words chosen by early church councils, used in our liturgies, and by our theologians are the basis for so much of Church dogma. And, small steps like this acquiescence on a point that at one time seemed incontrovertible reignites my hope that important change is possible in the Catholic Church. I rejoice, perhaps selfishly, that true communion between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches could be possible. And, I cautiously celebrate this small indication that the Church may be willing to consider compromise when a higher end is within sight.

Rebecca Curtin holds degrees from the University of Notre Dame and Harvard Divinity School. She lives in Somerville, MA.

Perfect

Felicia Schneiderhan

My first thought always when hearing today’s Gospel is “Good, I don’t have to be perfect.”

See, I have this perfectionism thing going. My spiritual advisor reminds me that my perfectionism is really pride in disguise; really me trying to be God. “And where’s the God in that?” she asks.

Well, God’s not in the room at all. If I practice perfection, I have no need of God. Self-sufficiency! Let me do it myself! And let me get it right!

There are days when I “to-do” everything right. From the minute I wake up till the minute I go to sleep, I follow the rules and the to-do list to a perfect T. I wake up when the alarm goes off and instantly put my feet on the floor, ready to go. I do my morning prayer and meditation as specified. I eat what I am supposed to. I spend within my budget. I am on time. I get along with everyone – if only because I am so attuned to following the plan for the day that I have little time or attention for anyone. (Interacting with others is never on the to-do list.)

I’ll admit, these days are few and far between. But when they happen – oh, the glory of perfection! The rapture of going to sleep knowing that every piece of my puzzled day snapped perfectly into place. I am indeed proud on days like these, because they prove I can manage my own life, thank you very much.

Funny thing on these quests for perfection: they are sought alone.

For example: I have recently discovered that nothing brings out my perfectionist tendencies like being a new mom. I am so inexperienced and dead-set on doing everything right for my four month-old son that I miss the obvious.

Sleep books stack high on my nightstand, so I can stay up late reading about how to perfect my son’s sleep schedule, so that his brain will develop perfectly and he will be perfectly happy all the time. According to my current reading, he should be napping three times a day, at 9, noon, and 3, and then going to bed for the night sometime between 6-7. This is the daytime schedule: 9, noon, and 3. This is the schedule.

Yesterday my husband spent the afternoon working from home, and he observed me trying all sorts of means to get our son to take his 3 o’clock nap: ignoring his fussing and crying; lying down with him in our bed. This went on for nearly an hour before Mark changed his diaper and gave him a toy and he settled down. An hour later, at dinner, our baby ate voraciously.

“Maybe he was hungry,” Mark said. “Maybe that’s why he couldn’t settle down to nap.”

After a few minutes of defensively denying that I could ever miss my son’s hunger cues, I had to admit, Mark may have been right. Our son will eat just a bit, fall asleep, and as soon as I put him in his crib, he’s wide awake again, and I spend an hour trying to get him to fall back to sleep. I interpret his fussing and crying as sleep-deprivation, which may only be partly right. But had I stopped and been present in the situation, rather than vehemently sticking to the plan of perfection, I may have noticed that perhaps he had just nodded off early and needed to finish his meal.

If I am so set on following the plan perfectly, I miss the reality of the situation. I miss the other person. I miss the relationship.

In today’s Gospel, the Pharisee who follows the law perfectly, speaks his prayer to himself. Whereas the tax collector, a sinner, would not even dare to raise his eyes to heaven, for he knew to whom he was talking. Following the rules is beside the point; what’s important to God is that we enter into a relationship with Him. So often, our failings make it possible for us to acknowledge our need for God, to enter into the room with him. But joy and gratitude could serve this purpose just as well. In the end, our fulfillment is not from doing everything right, but from connecting in a meaningful way to God, and to those around us.

Late for the Party

by Angela Batie Carlin

I just returned from four days at my alma mater, where the annual convocation and reunion celebrated 80 years of women at YDS. I am still unpacking the images, the feelings, the thoughts, and the treasures of the experience.

I was emboldened and ignited by the tales of overcoming discrimination and firmly claiming a place in the Church and in the Academy from women a generation before me. It’s hard to believe that just decades ago – memories and experiences of women still living – there were quotas that only allowed ten women to attend the school. There were lectures from the dean that the women should be aware of all the men that were kept out of the school to allow their admission, all the “slots” they took up. There were scholarships lost upon the occasion of marriage. There was a sit-in in a men’s restroom because the only woman’s restroom on campus was three flights of stairs and an entire hallway away from the study spaces in the library. Women recalled being the first or second ordained in their tradition and the struggles that went along with that. There were no female faculty, no mentors when women first started. The history is not ancient; it is still right here, graspable.

I felt a little as though I was about 30 years late for the party. The struggle, commitment, energy of the women’s movement at YDS (and other institutions too, I’m sure) seemed so vital, and I felt as though I was surveying the results after the dust has settled, picking through the rubble and making sense of it all. What will the next generation of women think of our era? Will they see us as a chapter in the same book? Or as a dormant era of complacency? What will our legacy be?

As the airplane lifted out of Hartford, the Connecticut, I looked at the leaves on the trees turning vivid shades of red, gold, and amber. The landscape was striking, bold colorful strokes across the hillsides, crisp and stark. Then wisps of clouds reached out and soon all was hidden by the blinding white blanket of cover. I hope the vision of this experience doesn’t recede as quickly.

Angela Batie Carlin received her MDiv from Yale in 2007 and now serves on their Alumni Board. She is overwhelmed with gratitude for the women who paved the way.

Keep On Truckin’

I am teaching a student for whom English is a second language, and a recently acquired one at that. He is soon going to take a test that is far too advanced for his current level, and so he muddles through impossible readings and pretends to understand “communism” and “altruism” when really he needs a much more concrete and basic vocabulary. He needs “radiator” and “glacier.”

“Tell me what you don’t know,” I say, and he often doesn’t, but when he does, I reach deeper and deeper into my vocabulary, every word leading to another word he doesn’t know. Bringing me to where there are sounds instead of words, gestures, my hands thumping against my chest and pulling at each other, slamming a pen to the table and then setting it down with a soft caress: teaching the word gentle. Then we look at the rest of the sentence. He wants to give up, and sometimes so do I.

This Sunday’s readings have an almost maniacal focus on persistence. Moses has to keep his hands held up in the air in order to win a battle, and, unable to do this on his own, he enlists people to actually hold his hands up for him! This is a delightful image, but it’s also a little strange. It sort of sounds like God is one of those vending machines that you can only get the candy out of if you jog it in just the right way, but then if you’re lucky you’ll get two! Except in this story, what you get is mowing down your enemies with a sword, which is far less sweet-sounding. Read more »

The Bullies Aren’t Just Kids. And sometimes, they speak in God’s name.

by Kate Henley Averett

For weeks now, I’ve been thinking nearly constantly about the climate for LGBTQ people in our country. It’s hard not to: the recent media attention given to suicides of LGBTQ youth, most of whom had been bullied in their middle and high schools, has gotten a lot of people talking about it. The responses have been varied – from everyday folks reaching out to bullied youth via You Tube to tell them that it gets better, to discussion on television shows from public figures like Ellen DeGeneres, Anderson Cooper, and a whole host of celebrities appearing on Larry King Live, about what causes bullying and what we should be doing about it.

But the few responses that have struck me the most have been from those who have called out the American public – namely public religious and political figures – for modeling the very bullying behavior we, as a nation, are acting so surprised and perplexed over. Comedian Sarah Silverman had a particularly pointed video message for America in which she said:

Dear America: When you tell gay Americans that they can’t serve their country openly or marry the person that they love, you’re telling that to kids, too. So don’t be f***ing shocked and wonder where all these bullies are coming from that are torturing young kids and driving them to kill themselves because they’re different. They learned it from watching you.

Similarly, in a video commentary/PSA for the Trevor Project, queer ally, activist, and comedian Kathy Griffin quipped:

So let’s talk about these bullies. I just don’t think they came up with this anti-gay bias on their own. They weren’t born with it. The politicians, so-called religious leaders, and pundits who have made careers out of saying that being gay is wrong, or immoral, or that gays are somehow less than, they all have blood on their hands. Yes, all you anti-gay public figures, and you know who you are, you have the blood of these dead teens on your hands. Remember trickle-down economics back in the ‘80s? Well this is just trickle down homophobia.

What Silverman and Griffin both point to here is an idea that Catholics should find it easy to get behind – that when something is wrong with part of a society, it tends to have ramifications throughout. Put differently, when one part of the body is hurting, does the rest of the body not feel its pain? When one part of the body is infected by hateful, biased rhetoric, would we not expect this infection to spread to other parts of the body?

It was with all this on my mind that I opened an email this past week from Cody Maynus, a student at St. John’s University in Collegeville, MN, telling about an incident at the University in which a group of GLBTQ and allied students, who wore rainbow pins and ribbons to Mass to stand in solidarity with GLBTQ Catholics, were denied communion by the Archbishop of Minneapolis/St. Paul.

The back story to this incident is that Archibishop Nienstedt recently worked with the other bishops in Minnesota to produce and distribute 400,000 DVDs aimed at Catholic households across the state detailing the Church’s stance on same-sex marriage. According to this Associated Press article, the DVD included a call by Archbishop Neinstedt for a public vote to amend the Minnesota Constitution to define marriage on strictly heterosexual terms. There have been several moves by Catholics to express their displeasure over this campaign, including an organized movement to return the DVDs to the archdiocese.

The 25 or so members of the St. John’s University/College of St. Benedict community (including students, sisters and one monk) who decided to wear rainbow ribbons and pins to the mass that the Archbishop, didn’t seem to think of their act as political per se. One student, Elizabeth Gleich, told reporters that they were simply hoping to make a statement, both to the Archbishop, that they disagreed with the DVD campaign, and to LGBTQ Catholics, that they were in solidarity with them. The Archbishop, however, saw things differently, and decided to deny them communion. Archdiocesan spokesman Dennis McGrath told reporters, “[The rainbow is] a symbol of the GLBT movement en masse, and it was intended as a protest. It was pretty obvious.”

At the end of the day, whether the statement the students were making was political or not is, to me, not the point. The point is that Archbishop Neinstedt, through his DVD campaign and through the act of denying GLBTQ and allied students communion, is contributing to the anti-gay rhetoric that is plaguing our country and having drastic, even deadly effects. Imagine being a 13-year-old kid and being gay, or questioning your sexuality, and coming home after being bullied at school to find your parents watching a DVD in which some of the most revered men in your faith tradition are railing against gay marriage. Bullying and anti-gay talk isn’t just following you home from school via facebook at this point, but it’s coming at you from people who you have been taught to respect, to trust, and to view as carriers of God’s truth. Can you imagine how such a message would make you feel? And at the same time, many of the kids who are bullying you at school are coming home to see this same message, and from it, they take away a sense of divine justification for their actions. To then read in the news that the Archbishop has denied the Eucharist – the source and summit of our faith – to those who stand in solidarity with LGBTQ Catholics, only further reinforces this idea that the bullies are right, that gay people are somehow less than, less important, less deserving of God’s love and the love of God’s people, than straight people.

Public figures with anti-gay messages are bullies, too. They bully with their words, and with their actions designed to publicly reprimand and exclude those who don’t conform to their ideas of what’s right. And as hard as it might be to hear it, our religious authorities are part of this group. If we care about the well-being of LGBTQ youth, and we want the bullying in schools to stop, we have to tell the grown-up bullies to stop, too.

Whether you’re feeling dissatisfied, angry, concerned, sad, or outraged, there are things you can do to take action. Please consider writing a letter to the editor of your local newspaper expressing your concern, as a Catholic, over the stance of Catholic officials on LGBTQ issues. Make a You Tube video, write a blog post, or do something to make a public statement to LGBTQ youth – and adults – that the views of the hierarchy do not represent the views of all Catholics, and that there many Catholics out there who love these youth as the beautiful children of God that they are. Wear a rainbow ribbon to show your support and solidarity. While these actions may be seen as inappropriately political by the Catholic hierarchy, I challenge you to remember that in a climate like this, silence – interpreted as assenting to the Church’s words and actions – is just as political and just as powerful a statement.

Kate Henley Averett holds an MDiv from Harvard University and is currently pursuing a PhD in Sociology at the University of Texas – Austin. She is outraged by the way society treats LGBTQ people, especially youth, and she hopes that you are, too.

Gracious and Faithful

by Jen Owens

In coming to the readings for this week, I find myself in the thick of things, like all the characters we meet in these three stories—trying to show gratitude for something miraculous like Naaman is, identifying with the suffering of Paul and desiring the freedom that comes with the word, and wanting so much to have the strength to be gracious and faithful, like the Namaan in the First Reading and the Samaritan who is healed of his leprosy in the Gospel.

I see the same efforts toward graciousness and faithfulness in the local parish to which I belong. People encounter God there. They care about one another and do their best to honor the presence of God in each other. It’s not perfect, but there is something about the trying—the loving and forgiving and making of mistakes—that brings us closer to God and to one another.

But I find myself stumbling over the workings of the institutional church, disappointed by the aftermath of the sex abuse scandal in this country and in parts of Europe, deeply saddened to learn that those who are in a position to make decisions that could allow for greater accountability and inclusivity often choose not to do so. These questions about who is responsible to whom and for what, questions about who has a place at the table have been with us for some time; they’re hardly new. These crises only highlight them in a way that calls on us not to look elsewhere, that encourages us to keep our focus on what is most crucial to the survival of our community.

Maybe this is the way that I can be gracious, maybe this is the way that I can be faithful. At first glance, it might look otherwise, but the more time I spend praying with the concerns I have about what I see in the Catholic community, the more I am convinced that they are valid and need to be raised in order for us to move forward in a way that promotes the kind of freedom that comes with the word that 2 Timothy proclaims. Taking an apophatic approach to the church, saying that this is what the church is not, leaves room for a kataphatic approach to the church to emerge, saying that this renewed vision of the church of the future is what the church can be.

Jen Owens lives in an intentional ecumenical community in Kensington, CA. She is a parishioner at St. Augustine in Oakland, CA.

Present to the Presence

by Felicia Schneiderhan

We had a BBQ last weekend that demanded the clearing of a side counter in the kitchen – the counter which catches about a month of mail. This counter – I’m not exaggerating – had more than a foot of paper piled up on it. My husband Mark did what any smart person would do; he threw it all in a Rubbermaid container and pushed it in the closet.

Yesterday morning I dragged the container upstairs to my office, and while our three month-old lay on a blanket playing with the arch of fuzzy toys suspended over his head (he has recently discovered his hands), I dug into the month of mail.

Somehow (I have my suspicions) I have landed on every Catholic mailing list in the country. I get appeals for this group of the little saints and that group of big saints and random churches in Colorado and orphanages and missionaries and subscription cards for every Catholic publication in the country and the delightful Trappists’ Christmas catalog of chocolate and beer gift sets. This month’s mail pile had an extra bonus: a DVD from our diocese entitled “Preserving Marriage in Minnesota.”

It’s amazing to me how many of these mailings appeal to the “Conservative” Catholic, as opposed to the “Liberal” Catholic, and that these are terms devised by advertising companies and political re-election think tanks, to corral people into manageable marketing groups, to successfully divide and conquer.

If you were to take all the people attending Mass on Sunday morning and break down our personal beliefs, I’m willing to bet that each of us would have a combination of both “liberal” and “conservative” beliefs. Yet we are all there to celebrate the Mass together, to celebrate the Real Presence of Christ among us.

According to the recently-released (and quite fascinating) U.S. Religious Landscape Survey, conducted by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, 52% of Americans think that Catholics believe “the bread and wine are symbols of the body and blood of Jesus Christ,” while 45% think that Catholics believe “the bread and wine actually become the body and blood of Jesus Christ.”

In my own experience, the idea of the Real Presence was something I always struggled with and pushed aside, since it was more comfortable to not think about it, rather than grapple with how to think about it. Until last summer, when a series of events too long for a blog entry pushed me face to face with my own prejudices about whether or not the bread and wine actually become Christ’s body and blood. When pressed up against my own belligerent denial, I worked with a spiritual director, read and researched, prayed and argued with God, and finally, in my heart,
believed. I now have faith that the sacrament of the Eucharist does indeed change bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ. Christ lives among us, in the flesh, at every Mass.

I also believe this change occurs regardless of the sin of the person or people performing the sacrament, regardless of the belief of the congregation. The Presence exists whether or not I am present to it.

If the pile of mail is an accurate cross-section, we as a Catholic community are so busy defining right and wrong, playing God, that we have forgotten the Real Presence among us. We suffer the delusion that we must stand for God, when, in fact, God stands for God, and does so at every Mass. We do not need to interpret God’s will, or enforce God’s law, or represent God’s name. Christ gave us the gift of the Eucharist to relieve us of the burden of being in charge, of being right. Instead, we can focus on the two commandments Christ did give us: Love God and Love Each Other.

Felicia Schneiderhan lives in northern Minnesota with her husband Mark and their son Rafael.

Soft Hearts

by Angela Batie Carlin

My, the readings feel dismal today. But, I suppose some people would call the life of the Church dismal these days. With each new news story – from parishes closing their doors to new clergy abuse scandals to the divisive topics of marriage equality and women’s inclusion, not to mention the looming new translation of the Missal, it seems that each new movement of the Church brings the faithful into greater opposition and polarization. The first reading’s “strife and clamorous discord” sound familiar.

That is why I find today’s readings actually encouraging. It gives perspective and context to our struggles today. While a different situation, the feelings are the same – violence, threat, and abandonment. There’s strange comfort in realizing that we are not the only era of discontent in which people have felt in crisis before. Yet, the people marched on and God did not forsake them.

It makes me look toward the future, too. If people have wrestled for centuries, I wonder how much longer we will long for peace (“Why must you let me see ruin; why must I look at misery?” pleads Habakkuk.) If not the division in our Church, then the true suffering of the vulnerable of our world surly must move our hearts. Do we truly hope and believe that things will change? Or are our cries a lament, as we look toward a final, distant horizon for true justice to prevail?

So, if our struggle is just another thread in the tapestry of people’s plights through the ages, how do we keep our hearts from hardening? How can we keep our hearts, well, soft? How do we notice the suffering, recognize that the end is probably not in sight, and still continue to make ourselves vulnerable? Others online here have discussed the question “why do I stay?” Some have left. For those who remain, how do we find life and nurture in the midst of pain and struggle?

It’s the work of the Spirit. As the psalmist instructs, “If today you hear God’s voice, harden not your hearts.” God continues to call, and with that call comes the grace to respond instead of harden, to receive the blessings instead of the curse, to develop community and relationships instead of calluses. The second reading reminds us that we are to “bear our share of hardship for the gospel” but that we’ll have the “strength that comes from God” with which to do that. Strength to cultivate, against all logic, hearts of softness – strong, steadfast softness – as we grapple, wrestle, love, and grieve.

Angela Batie Carlin is a Campus Minister and a 2007 graduate of Yale Divinity School. She’s looking forward to the YDS convocation celebrating eight decades of women this month.

Beatification of Cardinal Newman

by M. Nelle Carty

If we insist on being as sure as is conceivable…we must be content to creep along the ground, and never soar. ~ John Henry Newman

Just after I came to London to be with my fiancé, I heard that Pope Benedict XVI had been invited by the Queen to make a state visit to the United Kingdom. The British media, which is known for its negative coverage on anything Roman Catholic, portrayed angry British citizens who were against this visit. These critics claimed that taxpayers’ money should not be used for a religious leader who is against gender equality, who is against homosexual marriage and who assisted in the cover-up of sexual abuse by clergy. Critical television programs like “The Trouble with the Pope,” and “What the Pope Knew” were highlighted as the must-see programs during the week prior to the papal visit. As a Catholic American woman who lived in Boston, I have seen how media criticism can bring about awareness and affect change. Somehow, though, it felt different here. The negativity towards the Pope and Catholicism did not feel like it was trying to change the Church as much as it was trying to dissuade the faithful from practicing. In light of this perception, I have found myself more defensive than ever before about being Catholic. Being Catholic here is different than being Catholic in the United States.

Perhaps this is why Pope Benedict chose an anti-secularism theme for his UK visit. His message was not merely a homiletic topic mentioned once during his visit. Instead, it was a plea to Catholics and all people of faith in the UK. This message rained down on parched ears and hearts longing for spiritual nourishment. People were so eager to see the Pope and hear his message that they lined the streets in Edinburgh, Glasgow, London and Birmingham. The final day of the visit, people traveled through the night from all over England to be present at the Beatification of Cardinal John Henry Newman in Birmingham (a large city in the center of the country). Pilgrims arrived on buses as early as 3am equipped with rain gear, folding chairs and coolers of food. The choir began singing at 7 am, helping maintain the spirit of enthusiasm among a soggy crowd. At 9:30am when the Pope’s helicopter circled overhead, the steady rain became a drizzle, the sun peaked out from behind the clouds and the 55,000 pilgrims who were camped on the sloping hill of Crofton Park cheered as if a rock star were entering a concert venue. The excitement was contagious. A sea of flags–white and gold papal flags created especially for Benedict’s UK visit, British Union Jacks, the Irish Tricolour, and banners saying “Papa We Love You”– replaced the numerous umbrellas. The Popemobile took Benedict XVI from his helicopter through the crowd, stopping frequently to kiss babies and greet the faithful pilgrims. When he finally reached the side of the altar, the liturgical procession of clergy wearing clear rain ponchos over their white vestments began, and the rain stopped.

Following the traditional introductory dialogue and penitential act of the mass, the Archbishop of Birmingham initiated the Rite of Beatification by requesting that the Venerable John Henry Newman be beatified. The Beatification is the penultimate step in becoming canonized a saint, and this marked the first beatification in Benedict XVI’s papacy. We heard an account of Newman’s life and the miracle needed for him to be beatified, and then Pope Benedict XVI declared him “blessed.” The liturgy of the word took place after the beatification and was followed by a moving homily on the Blessed Cardinal John Henry Newman. Pope Benedict focused on Newman’s contributions during his life in 19th Century England and the lasting affects of his ministry on us today. These included Newman’s emphasis on prayer as a means of growing closer to God, his “insight into the relationship of faith and reason,” his impact on Catholic education, and his pastoral care for the people to whom he ministered. This eloquently written homily described Newman as an exemplar searching for Truth and living this out on a daily basis.

The mass continued with the Liturgy of the Eucharist and concluded with an ever-enthusiastic crowd waving the Pope goodbye. This event evoked several reactions from me. I was amazed that there was such a sense of holiness at an outdoor mass with 55,000 people. I have been to university-wide masses with several thousand people, but I have never celebrated with as many people as there were at the Beatification mass. There was a period of silence after communion that struck me as particularly sacred. There was a real Presence that made this silence louder than any of the crowds’ cheers.

Although there was an air of excitement present throughout the day, there was also a sense of normalcy and comfort that came with the ever-familiar rituals of the mass. The liturgy parts of the liturgy are the same the world over. There is a sense of being at home at a Eucharistic celebration, even when a person may be very far from their geographical home.

At the conclusion of this two-hour mass, people were left with a sense of joy. They weren’t in a hurry to get home—partially because they came by bus and were not scheduled to leave for another hour or two! Nevertheless, people pulled out their picnic lunches, shared food with one another, talked with one another, and enjoyed the dry weather. This is church. This day affirmed what church is and what I love about being Catholic. The Catholic Church is far from perfect, but it is good. The sheer number of pilgrims who made an effort to come out and celebrate various events around the UK with Pope Benedict XVI spoke louder than any verbal defense of the Catholic faith. The media recognized what a “success” this papal visit was and called the Beatification the “spiritual highlight” of the visit (“The Pope’s Visit” aired on BBC Two, 20 September 2010 19:00 GMT). As a pilgrim fortunate enough to make the journey to the Beatification mass, I found myself feeling less defensive and renewed in my decision to remain Catholic.

M. Nelle Carty is learning about Catholicism outside of the United States.

It Gets Better

by Kate Henley Averett

Whilst procrastinating on my work last week, reading feministing–one of my favorite blogs–I came across the most beautiful thing.

It’s called the It Gets Better project, and it was started by Dan Savage and his husband Terry in response to the latest rash of gay teen suicides. Dan and Terry, like many others, reacted by saying “I wish there was something I could do about this.” But rather than stop there, they actually did something, and have given others an outlet to do the same.

The premise of the project is simple – GLBT adults are invited to make a youtube video addressing GLBT/questioning middle and high schoolers with the simple message that “it gets better.” People are responding, and in doing so, creating a virtual community of concerned, caring GLBT adults and allies, providing a virtual safe zone for kids who don’t have a physical one.

I haven’t made a video yet. I plan to. But I have spent some time watching some of the videos that have been posted. One thing that struck me right away in the first two videos I watched – Dan and Terry’s video, and one made by Perez Hilton – was the experience both Dan and Perez described of being bullied at their Catholic high schools. My heart breaks for any kid who is bullied at any school, but there is something especially wrong, in my mind, with this happening in places where Jesus’ message of love and justice is taught alongside other subjects.

I’m also struck by how, despite the bad experiences these men had at their religious high schools (Terry was also mercilessly bullied at a Christian school), there is something so incredibly Christ-like about this project. I like to think that if Jesus were on earth today, this is exactly the kind of thing he would do about the bullying of gay kids and teens – speak out against the injustice, and also do what he could to welcome these youth into his community.

Kate Henley Averett is currently pursuing a PhD in Sociology at the University of Texas at Austin. A former youth minister and nanny, she cares a lot about the well being of kids, especially GLBTQ and otherwise gender non-conforming kids. She hopes that you’ll take some time to watch some of the amazing videos on the It Gets Better project’s youtube channel, at http://www.youtube.com/itgetsbetterproject.

For Your Consideration

This Sunday we won’t have a blog post on the readings, but we do have a couple links for ya. One is the USCCB website, which has the readings of the day for every day of the liturgical year, including this one. The other is a National Catholic Reporter article on Haiti, entitled “Haiti: Grace in the Rubble.” Happy reading! Hope your reflections are fruitful.

The Swinging Friar

by Rebecca Curtin

It’s fall, and baseball season is coming to a close. It’s bittersweet saying goodbye to the “Boys of Summer,” and it’s tempting to be caught up in the excitement of a new football season, to anticipate falling leaves, pumpkins, and holidays.

But, for now, I’m still thinking about baseball. Baseball and this fellow.

The Friar. The Swinging Friar, mascot of the San Diego Padres, my home team. The Padres have had a solid season and are – as this goes to press – neck and neck in the race for their division title.

The Swinging Friar is one of the only religious figures who is also a mascot of a major American professional sports team (the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim and the New Orleans Saints being others). He is definitely the only mascot with a tonsure. Sometimes, during breaks between innings at Petco Park, he runs the bases. Really. It’s a sight to see, a pretty silly sight at that, and one that always makes me laugh.

The inspiration for the Swinging Friar is Junípero Serra, the Franciscan priest who was instrumental in the founding of 21 missions in Alta California, still a colony of Spain in the eighteenth century. Young Californians learn about these missions in school and visit them on field trips. Father Serra’s first, the Mission San Diego de Alcalá was established in 1769, seven years before the Declaration of Independence was written.

The San Diego Padre is a loaded figure, as many religious symbols are, especially in the southwestern United States where the Spanish missions were established to “civilize,” “cultivate,” and “convert” the native populations. Behind that goofy smile and gelatin physique is a subtext of colonization and oppression. He is a remembrance of a cultural institution long dead and of two governments overthrown in succession, first Spain by Mexico then Mexico by the United States. Many of the California missions have been restored, but others exist in various states of disrepair, the most famous ruins probably those of San Juan Capistrano, where a dilapidated and beautiful church still rises half-formed over the mission walls.

The Swinging Friar sometimes feels less like a reference to the original padres and more like a figure from a medieval carnival, which parodied the Church by turning powerful figures into caricatures of themselves, to be both taunted and cheered on by a reveling crowd. The carnivals were venues where it was okay to lampoon the powerful. The Friar’s generous belly speaks of opulence, his blithe nature to a carefree outlook, hardly qualities, I think, of the padres who lived and worked with the native Americans in mission communities, more Friar Tuck, less Father Serra. Every home game a little Mardi Gras.

It has always bothered me to hear someone say that they prefer the East Coast of the United States because of its history. I do love the old cemeteries, the historical sites, and that musty smell of the oldest houses of New England, my adopted home. But, the history of what is now the Southwestern United States is uniquely intertwined with the history of Catholicism in the New World. It’s our history, the history of the Catholic Church in America, and it’s messy, complicated, and sad. It’s a history at once brutal and beautiful.

Sometimes the only way to deal with instances of such stark paradox is to make fun of them, to laugh, as I always do when that jolly friar awkwardly slides into home.

Rebecca Curtin was, as a small child, often mistaken for a boy, both because of her non-existent head of hair and because of the San Diego Padres cap she refused to take off. She would like to point out that the San Diego Chicken, though awesome, is not the “official” mascot of the Padres.

Hope for Change

I am guilty of being a hope-filled optimist. I like movies with happy endings. I cheer whole-heartedly for my team, even when I know there are slim odds they will win. At mass, I like to sing uplifting songs and hear a thought-provoking, and even motivational homily.

It shouldn’t be too surprising then, that I would look for the hope offered in this Sunday’s readings. After an initial read-through, I find myself drawn to the second reading from 1 Timothy(1 Tm 2:1-8). This reading begins by requesting “supplications, prayers, petitions, and thanksgivings…for everyone,” including leaders. What a positive and appropriate way to start a letter to a faith community—prayer! I read on. God came for all people through Christ. Yes, very true. And the reading ends with a beautiful wish, “…that in every place the men should pray, lifting up holy hands, without anger or argument.” Oops. It must be a linguist error, and it must have meant “people” instead of “men.” What a beautiful, and very necessary dream, that people from all over could come together and pray without disagreeing or fighting with one another. A dream many share.

A glutton for wanting to remain in this lovely image of the kingdom, I decide to read more from 1 Timothy.

POP! My bubble is burst. After this hope-filled image of people praying together, the letter continues by instructing reverent women to be silent. It declares that a woman should not teach or have any authority over a man. 1Timothy proceeds to defend this belief by using the old argument that Eve was the one who corrupted Adam. I stop reading. GRRRR!! In light of this, I am not under any illusion; the author really intended for his wish to be “men” not “people” coming together in prayer.

This is not a surprise. It is a disappointment. This is not the first time or the last time I will come across sexist language or teaching about the subordination of women. And so, I go through my very familiar, rational response:

  • The author of 1 Timothy was writing in and for a patriarchal time period and culture.
  • Fortunately, the Bishops did not include this misogynistic passage in the lectionary for this Sunday’s readings.
  • And the parishioners sitting in the pews on Sunday will not hear this section of the second reading that I’ve just discovered.

Do I need to dwell on this or expend my energy on this part of our tradition? No, I don’t. And yet, I cannot seem to ignore it.

This experience is an ongoing one that I encounter. I look for answers. I am looking for hope. I return to the beginning of the reading that jarred me from my task at hand. “Beloved: First of all, I ask that supplications, prayers, petitions, and thanksgivings be offered for everyone, for [leaders] and for all in authority, that we may lead a quiet and tranquil life in all devotion and dignity.” Ah, yes. I remember what spoke to me when I first read this second reading. This is where I should begin—prayer. The words of Joan Chittister come to mind: “Prayer is not meant to change the world; prayer is meant to change us so that we will then change the world.” A message of truth and hope! A message of which I constantly need to be reminded. And so as I go through this next week encountering situations that dash my hopes, may I remember to pray—prayers of petition and prayers of thanksgiving. May the church remember to pray for all. May we have hope that the world will change, not magically, but through our lives and actions.

M. Nelle Carty has just returned from a year of traveling. She is splitting her time traveling between the U.K. and the U.S, until she gets married and makes the move to London.

Mary Mary Quite Contrary

By Felicia Schneiderhan

A year and a half ago my husband Mark and I bought our first house.

The previous owners had beautiful gardens, but in two years of vacancy, things had gotten out of hand. The two planters in the front yard were overrun with hostas, sage, day lilies: dense and crazed, a good haircut a month past its prime. And the raised garden outside the kitchen bay window – who could tell the madness spawning in there? Six feet wide and twice as long, when we bought the house in July, the mystery meat of greenery was hip-high; by August, it reached my chin.

One afternoon, in feverish desperation, I went out with a kitchen knife and hacked it all down. The bed looked like a summer buzz cut gone awry.

This spring, I vowed to take action. My sister-in-law, a master gardener, advised me that the only way to really get rid of the weeds was to dig them all up by hand.

I like a challenge. Problem was, I was eight months pregnant.

It became my daily albatross to spend an hour or two in the weed patch, on my knees, unknown baby resting between my thighs, meticulously digging up each weed. It was just after the end of Lent, the relief of Easter. The weeds were only a foot or so high, and inch by inch I would gingerly take the weed and begin to pull. It was like chasing a walleye on the line into a sunken tree; careful not to break it off, careful not to let it tangle in the hidden branches. After an hour or two or some indiscriminant time, I would finally stand, letting the blood refresh my legs. I would sip water and stare down at the patch of land I had so carefully, tediously cleaned. On a good day, it was the size of a pillowcase.

In all, I logged about twenty hours on my hands and knees, pulling up weeds.

Finally, a few weeks before my due date, the garden was ready. At the grocery store, I stared at the picked-over seed display, and finally chose huge sunflowers and two large packets of wildflowers.

If you are a gardener, you are laughing right now.

I bought two bags of compost to feed the flowers I would plant and scattered the seeds willy-nilly. I waited, waited for the baby, waited for the flowers to greet him or her.

The baby came late, a week and a half after the due date; a beautiful boy was born to us, around the same time that the first brightly colored red poppies began to appear.

I learned to nurse. I learned to change a diaper. I sat at the kitchen table, overwhelmed by a crying baby I had no idea how to console, a house around me piled with laundry and mail and gifts demanding thank you notes. Outside, the garden stalks grew. More and more stems, filling every inch, crowding for soil and sun. Tiny white flowers appeared. A few more red and pink poppies unfolded silky petals. Three large sunflowers opened their eyes and turned their faces to the sun for a brief week, before bowing to a nor’easter.

Then came thick yellow dandelions, followed by prickly stalks sprouting mean-looking heads wreathed by purple flowers; real gardeners know them as the vicious stinging nettle. These flowers’ spindly arms wrapped themselves around each other, choking their brethren.

On Labor Day I admitted the obvious; wildflowers are a kind term for weeds.

In anticipation of my baby’s birth, in my rush to prepare a beautiful view from his nursery window, I had planted him a garden of weeds.

As fall sets in, summer is washed away in one windy rainy night in the north woods. The sky is fall blue now, and over a couple afternoons, my son asleep inside, I completely tore out the weed garden a second time. September is a time of new beginnings. Our Jewish brothers and sisters celebrate the High Holy Days with the Day of Atonement and the New Year. I am reminded of my own need to clean house, to take stock of what has accumulated in my spirit since the cleansing discipline of Lent. It’s time for me to do a little weeding within.

Felicia Schneiderhan lives in northern Minnesota with her husband Mark and their son Rafael. Having survived the “fourth trimester,” she’s back on the writing wagon.

Lost & Found

By Rebecca Lynne Fullan

I love this week’s readings. They are graceful and abundant, and cause me to rethink assumptions.  Look at Paul, in the second reading, for example.  Paul gets a lot of flack and complaint from Christians of a liberal bent, and there’s a tendency, mentally, to shove a lot of the tricky thorny stuff of Christianity in the Paul category, leaving the Jesus category free to be whatever we are actually comfortable with.  And I have my own bones to pick with Paul at times; I won’t pretend otherwise.  But reading about Paul this time made me think about him in a different way.  Here’s a man who had killed people out of the strength of his convictions—“I was once a blasphemer and a persecutor and arrogant…” When he talks about being the foremost of sinners, he’s not putting on a show.  He’s seeing himself, I imagine, collecting the coats while Steven was stoned, his back straight and proud.  He is genuinely overwhelmed by something genuinely overwhelming, a sort of tangle of wrongs that feels like a spider web, which tightens around you until it is time to be eaten.

I have a hell of a hard time just being courageous and open and less fearful in the tangle of wrongs I move within from day to day, realizing that my movements cause pain to others, intentionally and unintentionally, realizing that reaching out in compassion could put me at risk, that others cause pain to me.  I passed this man at a payphone on my walk home after work last night, and he was crying and angry and yelling into the phone, “I won’t sleep in that house!  I’ll sleep on the train first!  I’m not coming back in there!”  There was so much pain in his voice, and I paused for a moment, confused.  I wanted to touch his shoulder or ask him to come sit down with me in the pizza shop nearby or say, “You don’t have to sleep on a train.  You can come home with me.”

I didn’t do that, of course.  I know I can’t bring random angry crying men into my apartment, not if I don’t know them, not when I live with somebody else, and I wouldn’t if I lived by myself, either.  But I was tangled up, right then, in the pain and in my fear to reach through the pain to find the person.  And there’s Paul, in such a tangle, in such a horror, death and blood and arrogance on his hands (who among us doesn’t have arrogance on her hands, and its cringing twin inadequacy?) looking around at his life in wonder and saying, “This saying is trustworthy and deserves full acceptance: Christ came into the world to save sinners.”

Then comes Jesus, with his mouth full of tender, searching, searing parables.  Christ Storyteller, and I trust nothing in this world as I trust stories.  God is looking for you as a shepherd for a lost sheep.  God is looking for you as a woman for a lost coin.  God will welcome you as a father does his wayward child.  Tender and beautiful and hard to absorb.  I remain fearful of opening my arms, thinking, really?  God would search for me this way, with this focused attention, with this fervor, just when I am most lost?  I know myself when I am most lost, and I don’t see myself as this precious treasure in those moments.  I don’t see myself at all in those moments, really, just the hideous shadow puppets formed by my contorted cringing.  But that, these stories tell me, is when God will throw down the book, turn away from the TV with the sound still on, let the sauce boil over, run into the street and crawl up and down like a person who’s lost a contact and is blind without it.  The grace of such a thing is unimaginable, precisely because of when it comes.  It comes when we are lost, when even imagining such a search for us is like trying to comprehend a language we have never heard.

If I could trust this, really trust this, what risks of love could I take?  All of them, I think, I hope, all of them together.

There’s another piece worth considering, indeed necessary to consider, as the brother of the prodigal son reminds us in the gospel.  It’s not just me God is doing this crazy thing for.  It’s each person in their private tangles, each person in their own wilderness.  That means the people who scare and anger me.  My boss, when we are lost in a conflict and I feel so righteous and persecuted.  The man who broke into my apartment and touched my breast a few years ago.  Michael Enright when he stabbed Ahmed Sharif, his taxi driver, in the neck.   Paul with his pile of coats, watching the life go out of a man and saying to himself, “This is God’s will.”  Fred Phelps with his hateful signs outside funerals and his theology that I find as corrosive as acid.  Mothers who kill their children.  Men who steer planes into tall towers and call their deaths blessedly shattering.  Along with everyone suffering from these actions, along with everyone lost in the results, God seeks these people as though they are precious, in and out of the moments in which they are most lost.  God would run out into the street with the door unlocked, screaming their names, grabbing them out of the path of truck bearing down, clutching them against that constantly overexposed heart, which is thudding with life, with blood, with the depth of the mystery in a story like this.  Picture the faces you hate, the faces you truly fear.  Imagine them precious, cradled, a lamb in arms.

If we could trust this, really trust this, what risks of love could we take?

Rebecca Lynne Fullan is really enjoying the advent of fall weather in her wanderings, and is kind of excited that she and Paul have found some common ground.  She wishes you peace.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35 other followers